Synthesis Action FLEXIMAL 

Cognitive Buffer and Maladaptation in long-lived animals

Fleximal

Overview

Maladaptation caused by anthropogenic pressures is a major driver of population declines and extinctions, and understanding how some organisms deal with it is one of the major scientific challenges of our time. While the causes and consequences of maladaptation has long been a focus in ecology, the mechanisms by which organisms overcome maladaptive situations are little understood. This is especially true for animals with long generation times, which exhibit small populations and slow evolutionary responses. Yet some of these animals have achieved remarkable success in one of the most heavily human-modified ecosystems on Earth. Unravelling how long-lived animals navigate maladaptive landscapes holds substantial promise to refine our current understanding of biodiversity resilience in the Anthropocene. 

Fleximal board
Fleximal workshop

Objectives

The main objective of this Synthesis Action is to recognize the pivotal role of cognition in buffering long-lived animals against environmental challenges, a theory known as ‘cognitive buffer hypothesis'. Despite broad recognition of cognition as a source of behavioural plasticity that can shape environmental pressures, most current theoretical and empirical research on animals’ responses to anthropogenic pressures continue to treat animals as passive agents of external conditions. Thus, there remains an urgent need to incorporate cognition more formally into maladaptation research. We argue that this knowledge gap stems from a long-standing divide between neurobiologists and cognitive scientists, who study the causes of behavioural variation, and ecologists and evolutionary biologists, who examine its consequences. By bringing together specialists across these domains, the FLEXIMAL Synthesis Action will tackle this gap and explore how cognition may serve as a key mechanism to buffer populations against maladaptation.

Schedule

Day 1 - Conceptual framework: How can cognition buffer maladaptation?
  • 09:00 - 09:30: Welcome, objectives and introduction to the scientific problem
  • 09:30 - 10:30: What do we mean by cognitive buffering? Definitions and conceptual boundaries: maladaptation, cognition, decision-making, plasticity, buffering, …
  • 10:30 - 11:00: Coffee break
  • 11:00 - 13:00: Plenary discussion: agree on definitions and identify the main components of the conceptual framework
    13:00 - 15:00: Lunch
  • 15:00 - 16:00: How could cognition buffer maladaptation? Build the causal pathway from environmental challenge to behavioural response, fitness and demography
  • 16:00 - 17:00: Plenary synthesis: build one common conceptual framework

Day 1 output: Table of definitions + scheme of the conceptual framework. 

Day 2 - Evidence, gaps and future directions
  • 09:00 - 09:20: Recap of the conceptual framework
  • 09:20 - 10:45: What evidence supports the proposed causal pathway? Where is it weak?
  • 10:45 - 11:15: Coffee break
  • 11:15 - 13:00: Plenary discussion: evaluate evidence and identify the major missing links
  • 13:00 - 14:00: Lunch
  • 14:00 - 16:00: How can we fill the major gaps? Individual, population and macroecological approaches, using urbanisation as a model system
  • 16:00 - 17:00: Plenary discussion: connect priority gaps to feasible approaches

Day 2 output: evidence/gap map + table connecting priority gaps with possible approaches.

Day 3 - Integration and research agenda
  • 09:00 - 09:30: What have we learned over the first two days? Define sections of the manuscript. Plenary
  • 09:30 - 10:45: Start writing: Split in groups to delineate the contents of each section and start writing. 3 groups × 3
  • 10:45 - 11:15: Coffee break
  • 11:15 - 13:00: Continue writing: Split in groups to delineate the contents of each section and start writing. 3 groups × 3
  • 13:00 - 14:00: Lunch
  • 14:00 - 16:00: Continue writing: Split in groups to delineate the contents of each section and start writing. 3 groups × 3
  • 16:00 - 17:00: Final synthesis: mechanisms → consequences → evidence → critical gaps → future tests Plenary
  • 17:00 - 18:00: Outputs, next steps, responsibilities and closing Plenary

Participants & Organising Committee

Organising Committee

Felipe S. Campos
CREAF, SGR Forest Dynamics and Wildfires (proposal lead / PI)

Peter Roebeling
CESAM - Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies, University of Aveiro

Participants

Lucy Aplin

Dr. Lucy Aplin
Australian National University (AUSTRALIA)

Prof. Dr. Daniel T. Blumstein

Prof. Dr. Daniel T. Blumstein
University of California, Los Angeles USA

Alexandra Bateman

Alexandra Bateman
CREAF, Catalonia, Spain

Francis Dale

Francis Dale
CREAF, Catalonia, Spain

Damien Farine

Prof. Dr. Damien Farine
University of Zurich, Switzerland
Australian National University, Australia

Prof. Dr. Pavel Němec

Prof. Dr. Pavel Němec
University in Prague, Czech Republic

Prof. Dr. Denis Réale

Prof. Dr. Denis Réale
Université du Québec, Canada

Daniel Sol Rueda

Prof. Dr. Daniel Sol
CREAF, CSIC, Spain

Prof. Dr. Alex Taylor

Prof. Dr. Alex Taylor
University of Barcelona, Spain

Funding

Venue

CREAF headquarters
Campus Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
Building C
08193 Cerdanyola del Vallès
Catalonia, Spain